Tell me What Happens ??!!!

ATOMIC Clock !!

2010-03-14T09:43:00.000-07:00

Atomic Clock :

What time is it? It’s the choice on Sunday and the official at the moment is always to overcome the betting, courtesy of the atomic clock of the real Matt Rivers. He’s already a gathering of betting on the chalk in shooting for Joshua Clottery.

Do not make such Cheryl Maher and extortion at the man and just beat him.

Elite sports race Matt Rivers, a senior analyst at the Minnesota OffshoreInsiders.com takes plus points. They get four in most sportsbooks.

What an amazing end of the season, Smith obese Golden Gophers. This team was dead and buried is not longer than a few weeks, according to many, including me. This program has been through a ton in terms of suspension and cross-cutting issues and seems to be worn down and just underachieving to the fullest.

Minnesota has always had some talent, and many of the Big Ten surprise people, but every team in all it’s just never materialize. Until now.

WESTBROOK, Joseph, Sampson III and Hoffarber a task force right now that is not a joke at all. After three straight victories for the ridiculously impressive in this tournament, and on the 21-12 destruction, should be those guys in the big dance. Why did they do to Bordeaux yesterday it was impossible to believe. Yes, Robbie Hummel and manufacturer of boilers was terrible, but do not take all the credit away from yesterday’s three-point puppy.

But far from certain that the threshold of the Gophers certainly have punched tickets and go out there today, as if it were their lives are in danger of the tournament and admired one more time. It will not be easy in any way as Evan Turner is the best player in the nation, and Box is a high quality team that is in the worst seed in two NCAA tournament].

As I said yesterday, although when I went against Ohio State, Thad Matta and that children do not suffer from flawed because it lacked many of the bench, and can get outrebounded in some cases.

(OSU)seemed very modest at best in every game from here in Indianapolis, it is very clear so lucky to have beaten Michigan in 35 foot buzzer beating three and they were certainly more than yesterday by the Illini double-overtime in the film.

The seizure of about four is not only a great deal because the Ohio State team is superior but the Gophers seem very focused and on mission at the end of the day, and I do not see another average performance from the Xbox to be able to derail this train high.

311 DAYS

2010-03-11T12:48:00.000-08:00

311 Still Does 311 Day?!

311 is throwing the "Ultimate 311 Day" event in Las Vegas this year, which will undoubtedly make many people ask themselves "Wow, they still do that?"

The Ultimate event is happening on March 11th, exactly ten years to the day of the first event in New Orleans, Louisiana. In the year 2000, 311 performed a 46-song set which will probably pale in comparison to this year... being that the performance is projected to last at least five hours.

"I don't think we'd be able to physically play a show like this, not even once a month." said bassist P-Nut Willis. "But I'm ready. I'm trying not to think of it as this huge thing, because, if you think about it, the people who attend most rock shows are on their feet for the same amount of time," Wills said.

"It helps to see it from that side of things. We're the entertainment, but of course the fans are going to be there with us the whole time. Then again, [frontman] Nick [Hexum] does do marathons, so I know he's going to be ready. We all are, because we think of this as a huge opportunity to do something special, to play the ultimate show every two years for our most fanatic fans. It's perfect."

Bears win Julius Peppers sweepstakes

2010-03-05T18:20:00.000-08:00

Julius Peppers joined the Chicago Bears in the biggest move by a team that showed it's intent on contending again after missing the playoffs the past three seasons.

The five-time Pro Bowl defensive end and top free agent prize agreed Friday to a six-year deal worth potentially $91.5 million.

Agent Carl Carey said a record $42 million is guaranteed, with Peppers earning $20 million in the first year. The deal includes incentives for sacks, making the Pro Bowl and winning Defensive Player of the Year.

"It's one thing to play football in this league and make a living, but it's a totally different thing to come to a place with a rich tradition like the Bears," Peppers said.

Besides Peppers, the Bears lured running back Chester Taylor from NFC North champion Minnesota with a four-year contract and blocking tight end Brandon Manumaleuna from San Diego with a five-year deal. Taylor's contract is worth $12.5 million with $7 million guaranteed, according to a person with knowledge of the negotiation. The person spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity because the deal had not been announced.

By landing one of the league's top pass rushers and a running back who could challenge incumbent Matt Forte, Chicago showed just how serious it is about contending in the NFC after missing the playoffs the past three years.

General manager Jerry Angelo and coach Lovie Smith are operating on a win-or-else mandate from above after a 7-9 season that left many in Chicago calling for sweeping changes.

A coaching staff shake-up that left the Bears with new offensive and defensive coordinators in Mike Martz and Rod Marinelli was just a start.

The signings on Friday do not guarantee a turnaround, as Bears fans learned last season after the trade with Denver for quarterback Jay Cutler. Even so, the Bears did address some big needs, particularly on the defensive line.

The 6-foot-7 Peppers brings uncanny athletic ability and questionable consistency, along with the 81 sacks he collected in eight seasons with Carolina — 10 1/2 last year. In Chicago, he'll get to play alongside Lance Briggs, Brian Urlacher and Tommie Harris and give a much-needed boost to a defense that ranked 17th overall and tied for 13th in sacks with 35.

Peppers had been looking to get out of Carolina the past few years, and he basically got his wish when the Panthers decided not to place the restrictive franchise tag on their career sacks leader for a second consecutive year at a cost of at least $20.1 million.

That decision ended two rocky years of negotiations between the Panthers and Peppers, who played at North Carolina and was drafted second overall by Carolina in 2002.

Peppers acknowledged in a radio interview last month that he turned down a contract offer after the 2007 season that would have made him the NFL's highest-paid defensive player. A year later, the Panthers ignored his public pleas to be allowed to leave in free agency and slapped him with the franchise tag and a one-year, $16.7 million tender.

Peppers eventually softened his stance and began negotiating on a long-term contract. They couldn't agree, and he wound up earning $18.2 million in 2009, including a $1.5 million bonus for making the Pro Bowl.

Taylor, meanwhile, backed up All-Pro Adrian Peterson in Minnesota. He'll challenge for time in the Bears backfield after Chicago's hallmark running game slipped last season, with Forte rushing for 929 yards after finishing with 1,238 as a rookie in 2008.

Taylor had 42 catches for 389 yards and 94 carries for 338 yards as a valuable third-down player for the Vikings. He rushed for 1,214 yards in 14 games in 2006 before Peterson arrived and reduced his role.

Your opinion worth Money !!!

2010-02-22T18:13:00.000-08:00

Happy day to every one

Every one is talking nowadays about
How to get paid for your opinion !!

Today I’m gonna tell you about the easiest and cheapest way to earn money from your spare time on internet instead of Facebooking or trying your luck on ICQ Chat .

I discovered _For the first time_ that My opinion worth money !!

I never thought that I can make 5 Dollars in 5 minutes ! just for giving my opinion or my feedback .!!

Are you ready to calculate how much I earned after using internet for 2 hours in this job !?!

Although this type of job is very Profitable but it is not well known !

YOU TALKED SO MUCH But YOU DIDN’T TELL US

(((What is this all about ??)))

well ,,,,,

To understand simply the idea of this type of jobs
let me give you an example :

(A car company studying a new safety system and need to get feeds from consumers .

this company hire a web site like this one for example

to hire random people giving their opinions about the new safety system

and in turn give You from 5 -up to 120 dollars for each survey form,_ depending on the importance and length of the form _

Understand ?!!!

So… Simply ….

I give them my opinion and in turn they pay me for giving them Honest answers.

(((Your opinion is extremely valuable to companies as they alter their products, policies, and services based upon the feedback of consumers.

these Companies know that your time is valuable and they will compensate you for it.

Briefly this is the perfect job for lazy people like me

It is not a difficult work. If you have a job with a computer, you can quickly complete a few surveys during your lunch break. If you don’t mind having a laptop in front of you while you unwind and watch TV at night, filling out a survey or two can be done between commercials.

As long as you are at least 18 years old, anyone can start making money

I hear a question coming from your mind asking How Can I be sure that these companies would pay me as they promised ?

Well … websites like the one I told you about is investing time and money in finding and verifying all the companies that will pay you for surveys.

So it’s very secure and safe .

But in turn they ask you to pay JUST (less than 5 Dollars )

because They maintain and update their database regularly and verify all the companies that will pay you for surveys.

On the website you will find ((Real check received )) for the pay
One of the signed up members said

I was skeptical at first when I saw this because it seemed too good to be true, but after I joined and started taking these surveys, I realized this was the real deal. I can’t believe how easy it is to make money with surveys

And this Paragraph resembles exactly what i felt when I heard for the first time about these types of jobs

But Now I’m not skeptical any more ( my increasing bank account dollars surely removed my fears and doubts away )

As an expert in this field I collected some of these websites for you
You can start by trying the cheapest one of them
and after recieving your first check from your new job
& after being sure that these companies are seriouse you can start signing up for the rest of the websites.

After all, who wouldn’t want a couple hundred dollars a day just for giving their opinion?

this is a list of the most trusted websites hiring people for surveys

starting with the cheapest to start Trying and then deciding .

_You don’t have to be an american or living in america to sign up
you will recieve your check wherever you live

And I'm saying to these people who asked me about if they will be taxed for any of my jobs suggestions

And My answer is NO !

you are considered an independent contractor, and no taxes will be withheld from your pay

.!! Cool !

NOW Her's the list for the surveys

sites. I organized them starting with the

cheapest fees of registration .

(1)

This is the first Cheapest most trusted website .
you will not lose anything if you tried it for the first time

Click Here for SurveysPaid !

(2)

Another 5 dollars sign up fees >>>Click Here!

This website job opportunities:

**Try new products and “mystery shop" for pay... (And keep the products for FREE!)

**Participate in “focus groups” and get paid $100-$150 an hour!

**Watch movie trailers and commercials and get paid $10-$20+ an hour!

**Take surveys online, from anywhere, and get paid $5-$50+ an hour!

Take surveys on the phone, or by mail, and earn even more!

(3)

This one is for 29.95 Dollars BUT with 60 days money back guarantee ! >>

With this website
You have full 8 weeks to try our membership free. If you're not completely satisfied – you simply receive a complete refund of the membership fee.

This way you have nothing to lose whatever you decide. It's a win-win for you!

(4)

With this site (Surveys at home )
The registration is so easy
JUST three steps

Surveys At Home

(5)

Quick Paid Survey website registration fees is 67 dollars

Don't get shocked although its the highest registration fees 67 Dollars

But at this site {two surveys cover your registration fees }.

I think this short list of surveys paid websites is enough now

Soon I will get you a software that runs more than 3000 Surveys Sites !!

Ready to receive any of your questions
Send it to

Job_opportunities2010@yahoo.com

I will respond to it in next post

Gama Goat For Sale

2010-02-20T09:43:00.001-08:00

This is a little departure from my usual presentations. This car is not something you’d likely find on the local highways and alleys. However, if you live in the grace of heaven. Why? Gamma Goat and M561 is a military vehicle. As follows.
From goat:

..

And the M561 1.25 ton High Mobility cargo truck was built in late 1960 and in 1970 by Consolidated Diesel Electric Company, known as CONDEC. Was nicknamed the Gama Goat, “Gamma” from the name of the inventor of the common energy provided Roger Gamaunt and “goats” from the mountain goats abilites such as off-road.

M561 was 6×6 and the presence of a tractor-trailer unit. Tractor sat two, and the driver and a passenger, over the front axle, which stands behind it and the Detroit Diesel 3-53 diesel engine. Attached to the tractor by a joint unit is clearly the trailer, which was the military arrangements, like many of the standard type of pickup bed with the addition of troopseats folding along each side. The tractor-trailer and joined permanently. Tractor was the front axle and rear axle, while the trailer has launched in the mid-axis. All hubs were powered. And M561 has also been directed four wheels, and led the front in a normal fashion and most of the rear axle was a mechanic and drove in the opposite direction by 50 percent for the front motion axes. Self-direction, not position. The M561 was made of aluminum, and the car was swimable on inland waters. This car able to move higher than average, as a small truck or jeep 1/4ton because of its ability to flex in the middle, and the position forward of the front wheels.

The Gamma Goat was a successful way in the off-road, but due to the emergence of the plague of mechanical problems, engine noise loud, was the driver while the car start and debarking, the training of drivers in particular because of its four-wheel habits that he did not pursue in the coming decades, and was eventually replaced in the function of a series M998 HMMWV (High Mobility Multi-Wheeled Vehicles) or Home “vee”. For this reason, the surplus can be gamma goats in varying degrees of disrepair and can be purchased for a song and to restore and put into use. There is a small group of loyal fans and goat GamaGoat.com dedicated to preservation, restoration and enjoyment of these vehicles safe for attention.

One of the things that sets the exception of goat gamma military vehicles and other off-road and amphibious nature. Certainly, can not be home – vee (both HMMWV military and H1S much tamer commercial and H2S) Ford several feet of water, but may in fact goat swimming. Of course, it can not water that Ford is not cool, so you can not cross the raging torrent. But you can easily across the lake, as long as you make the necessary preparations to get ready for a goat pool and a proper maintenance thereafter.

Miss me yet Billboard For G.W.Bush real or just An internet trick ??

2010-02-09T12:17:00.000-08:00

Miss me yet?: The Billboard of former President George W. Bush is real Or not ???

Every one is asking is it true ?? Or just An Internet trick

But the truth is

(IT'S TRUE ) !!!

with the words “Miss me yet?”.

The Miss me yet? Billboard located along I-35 near Wyoming Minnesota, where it was and who paid for it?

At first glance, it would seem to be from some person or group who isn't thrilled by President Barack Obama's performance so far -- unless it's a more ironic message from those who didn't think too much of Bush and want to remind voters about him.

Anyone out there know anything about where it came from? Tell us and we'll pass the word to Bob......We mean BOB COLLINS

. As he says, we could do a little crowdsourcing.

Hey guys,,,,,,,,,, do you Miss him yet???!!

Who is Jackie Collins And what about her new novel(book) Release ?!!

2010-02-09T11:04:00.000-08:00

FIRST :

Jackie Collins is an English novelist and former actress younger sister of actress Joan Collins.

Jackie Collins legendary career penning fiction novels about the glamorous lives of Hollywood’s rich, famous and infamous has spanned decades.

Collins was born in LONDON, the daughter of Elsa Bessant and Joseph William Collins, a theatrical agent whose clients included SHIRELY , THE BEATLES and TOM JOANS , Collins'sSouh Africa -born father was jewish and her British mother was Anglican .A middle child, Collins has one sister, actress Joan collins (b.1933), and a younger brother, Bill Collins (b. 1946).

At 15, Collins was expelled from school, after she had been expelled, she threw her school uniform in the Thames .

Collins’ nearly 30 novels featuring a total of about 1,000 characters have sold more than 400 million copies.!!!! WOOOW !!

Jackie Collins has been the queen of the Hollywood roman à clef for 40 years. Her latest,

“Poor Little Bitch Girl,” out Tuesday, gives us more of the juicy same: the jet set, celebrity call girls, corrupt senators and the movie-star murder that ties them all together.

Collins, 72, said COMMENTING on hollywood: ( Hollywood has changed considerably since she first started writing about it.)

"When I wrote 'Hollywood Wives,' the book that really put me out there, that was in the '80s and the wives of the talk-show hosts and the moguls and the producers ran Hollywood."

It was a very social town back then, she explained, with deals made at the tennis matches, dinner parties, home screenings and nights-out that those Hollywood wives orchestrated.

"I don't think that happens today at all," she said. "I think the whole industry today is run by business suits."

Do you Support Building the Steel wall between Egypt and Gaza ??!!

2010-02-08T17:11:00.000-08:00

Do you Support Building the Steel wall between Egypt and Gaza ??!!

Do you support Building the steel wall between... » polls maker
Tags : egypt gaza steel wall support

We appreciate your comments Explaining your point of view .

Daniel Streich Who banned minarets in Switzerland converted to Islam !!!

2010-02-08T11:43:00.000-08:00

Swiss People’s party (SVP)....Is the political party that started the minaret ban initiative.in Switzerland And our man Daniel Streich was a member of this party ...!

Daniel Converted to ISLAM .But keep it as a secret for two years !!
But Daniel has left the SVp And made his conversion to Islam public.

Switzerland press said :((( For two years Daneil kept this secret from his ex-party. Now, with the “witch hunt against Islam,” this situation has become unbearable for him.)))

He was a true SVPer and Christian. He read the Bible and regularly went to church. Now Daniel Streich, military instructor and community council member, reads the Qur’an, prays five times a day and goes to a mosque!!!

He said when they asked him Why you took this step??
:"Islam offers me logical answers to important life questions, which, in the end, I never found in Christianity,""!

BUT Reactions in the SVP were mixed.

General Secretary Martin Baltisser.said “Everyone can believe what he wants to,”.
SVP-National Council member Alfred Heer had a less friendly reaction.

Politcal scientist Georg Lutz said : “The SVP and Islam stand closer to each other than people suppose. Both advance a conservative worldview.”

In my opinion Banning a minaret is like banning a church spire or tower. It is incidental to religion

Waiting for your comments

What is the cause of Connecticut Middletown explosion??

2010-02-07T18:16:00.000-08:00

More than 50 people have been killed and hundreds of injured people

The cause of this huge explosion is a natural gas leak, according to officials.

The middle town explosion happened in a power plant built south of the city on the Connecticut River.

Homeowners more than 10 miles away said the 11 a.m. explosion at the Kleen Energy Systems power plant on River Road created a shock wave so intense they mistakenly thought the central part of the state had experienced an earth quake.

Around 50 workers were in the section of the power plant where the explosion occurred at 11:37 a.m., blowing portions of the building away, Al Santostefano, Middletown’s deputy fire marshal, told the Associated Press. the cause of the explosion is under investigation.!!And most of investigation say it is because of the natural gas leakage

State police fire and explosive investigators were rushing to the scene at around noon Sunday, as well as state police urban rescue crews, which would search rubble for victims.

There were as many as 20 ambulances at the plant

The plant, one of the biggest to be built in New England in recent years, was supposed to bring cleaner and potentially cheaper power to the area, according to the Courant.

The plant reportedly has a 15-year contract with Connecticut Light & Power.

The power plant was still under construction and there are unconfirmed reports that workers were testing a gas line before the explosion.

NBC Black history Menue Fried chicken.cafeteria!!

2010-02-05T12:35:00.000-08:00

NBC apologized for and removed a sign in a network cafeteria listing a special Black History Month menu that included fried chicken, collard greens and jalapeno cornbread.

An NBC employee here in New York broadcasted the network's cafeteria menu from earlier today over the Twitter waves. To celebrate Black History Month, they were offering up a delicious selection of fried chicken, collard greens, corn bread, black eyed peas, etc. But then two hours later the sign was mysteriously removed, leaving diners with a grilled chicken option. It's unclear what could have possibly prompted NBC to change course (, but we hear employees are excited for St. Patrick's Day, when the commissary will serve Irish Car Bombs.

The sign, posted at network headquarters in New York, was photographed and tweeted by Questlove — the drummer for jimmy falon 's house band, the roots , on Late Night — with an accompanying tweet saying, "Hmm HR?"

It looks like NBC wasn't pleased with the attention brought onThe drummer later followed with, "I think I need a twitter break. I done started something. and now I must put out fire."

NBC officially declined to comment, but Kevin Goldman, NBC's vice president of communications, : "The sign in the NBCU cafeteria has been removed. We apologize for anyone who was offended by it."

My opinion

NBC is a right wing hate machine. But seriously, lighten up, Wanda. When you go to an Italian restaurant, do you expect to see pasta dishes with tomato sauce? When you go to a Mexican restaurant, do you expect to see anything with beans? If certain foods become linked to certain people, is that necessarily a bad thing?

Todd Leary the Famouse indian broadcaster Was arrested

2010-02-05T10:35:00.000-08:00

Todd Leary the Famouse indian broadcaster Was arrested !!!

Todd Leary, a former Hoosiers player and an Indiana broadcaster, has been arrested in connection with an alleged multimillion-dollar real estate fraud scheme.

Records show that Leary who is 39 years old was being held Friday in the Monroe County Jail in Bloomington.

The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne reports that Leary faces 17 felony charges, including conspiracy to misappropriate title insurance escrow funds. The newspaper reports court documents say

((((Todd Leary once worked for a title insurance broker who has pleaded guilty to several charges in a $2.7 million scheme...........!!! OOH!!

He was arrested on Thursday night before the IU-Purdue game. According to a report he is charged with 18 counts of misappropriations of escrow funds. Currently, he is at Monroe County Jail and waiting to be extradited to Allen County.
Leary was a star at Lawrence North and played for the Hoosiers in 1989-94, including their 1992 NCAA Final Four team.

Leary is the color analyst for IU’s radio broadcasts.

It couldn’t immediately be determined whether Todd Leary had an attorney OR NOT !!.

11 years old girl gave birth to ababy boy !!!

2010-02-05T08:36:00.000-08:00

- Again ...Another young girl gave birth to a baby
This time the girl is from Northeast .

She is only 11 years old (_just eleven_)!!!

The earliest young girl to ever give birth was Lina Medina a 6 year old in Peru in 1939.!!!!!!

What a record !!!

Any way ,,,,,,

The girl and her family are not being named in order to protect the girl’s privacy.
But this didn't affect her mother who said commenting on this accident..

((( ..“My daughter and baby are fine, and the baby is absolutely beautiful”!!!!

Well He is really beautiful ...But i doubt anyone would wish a baby in such circumstances !!!

Photos : Sharks attacked a man (kiteboarder )on stuart beach,Florida And killed him

2010-02-04T10:47:00.000-08:00

Sharks attacked a man (kiteboarder )on stuart beach,Florida And killed him

According to the Florida Sun-Sentinel, a 38-years-old kiteboarder was spotted a quarter mile off Stuart Beach surrounded by sharks.

Amazingly, a lifeguard paddled out to the scene where 38-years-old Stephen Howard Schafer, a resident, battled against a pack of sharks. The lifeguard rescued Schafer, pulling him onto the rescue board then paddled back. Schafer suffered multiple bite wounds and was given cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Schafer was pronounced dead at a local hospital. No word yet on what type of sharks attacked Schafer.

Kitesurfing or kiteboarding is a surface water sport that uses the wind to pull a rider through the water on a small surfboard or a kiteboard (similar to a wakeboard).

Generally kiteboarding refers to a style of riding known as freestyle or wake-style, whereas kitesurfing is more “wave-riding” oriented. These two styles usually require different boards and specific performance kites.

Authorities are now trying to figure out what kind of shark it was that killed him. They believe it is most likely a larger breed of shark, such as a bull, tiger, or possibly great white.

Yesterday, at 4:15 PM, lifeguard Daniel Lund saw Schafer through binoculars floating in an unguarded part of the ocean. He paddled out to get him and Schafer was screaming that he had been bitten. As Lund towed Schafer in, Schafer suddenly stopped talking. Rescuers administered CPR, and he was transported to Martin Memorial Hospital where he passed away.

Friends said Schafer always followed the buddy system while surfing and were surprised he was in the water alone.

"We always know that (sharks) are out there. You see them this time of the year," said Teague Taylor,

a childhood friend who says Schafer taught him to surf. "It's hard to believed that such an experienced waterman would make that one mistake."

Schafer, a gifted artist and graphic designer, was drawn to the water as a child. He surfed competitively and later started sailing, windsurfing and kiteboarding. Kiteboarders surf across the water on boards strapped to their feet, using large curved sails to pull them along.

"He had to be around the water," said Taylor, who manages a local surf store.

Investigation is still runing :(

What A sad news !!

Egypt one of the Top 10 Teams in World

2010-02-03T05:18:00.000-08:00

According to FIFA web site :

Egypt one of the Top 10 (BEST)Teams in World

The Africa Cup of Nations has had a major impact on the first FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking of the year. While Spain continue to occupy top spot ahead of Brazil and the Netherlands, Egypt managed to climb 14 places to tenth place after they successfully defended their title at the CAF Africa Cup of Nations in Angola.

This is not only Egypt’s highest-ever position in the ranking, but also the second-highest of any African team since the introduction of the ranking. They have only been bettered by Nigeria, who reached fifth place in April 1994. Other African teams also benefited from their performances in Angola. In the upper echelons of the ranking, semi-finalists Nigeria (15th, up 7) and finalists Ghana (27th, up 7) made considerable strides. Further down the ranking, Zambia (73rd, up 11) and Malawi (82nd, up 17) also made good progress.

Ahead of the FIFA World Cup™ in South Africa, an analysis of the strengths of each of the eight groups will doubtless prove interesting. In general, it is noteworthy that Group G is the only one to have two teams from the top ten (Brazil and Portugal), while Italy are the only representatives from the top 20 in Group F. Bearing in mind that only two teams from each group will go on to the round of 16, the “tightness” of the groups and the gap between the second and third team could prove particularly significant. With this in mind, two groups promise to be particularly exciting: there are very few points separating Mexico and Uruguay in Group A and Chile and Switzerland in Group H.

A total of 82 international “A” matches were taken into account for this edition of the ranking, 15 of which were played in 2009 (total of 849 “A” matches played in 2009). In addition to the 29 matches played in the Africa Cup of Nations, 11 continental qualifying matches and 42 friendlies were played.

Here's the RANK as its shown on FIFA website

Egypt is number 10

Ranking	Team	Pts Feb 10	+/- Ranking Dec 09	+/- Pts Dec 09
1	Spain	1627	0	0
2	Brazil	1568	0	0
3	Netherlands	1288	0	0
4	Italy	1209	0	0
5	Portugal	1176	0	0
6	Germany	1173	0	0
7	France	1117	0	0
8	Argentina	1082	0	-3
9	England	1076	0	0
10	Egypt	1069	14	237
11	Croatia	1053	-1	11
12	Greece	1030	1	14
13	Russia	1026	-1	0
14	USA	963	0	-17
15	Nigeria	956	7	108
16	Chile	955	-1	19
17	Mexico	947	0	16
18	Switzerland	924	0	0
19	Serbia	916	0	0
20	Cameroon	914	-9	-121
21	Uruguay	909	-1	0
22	Côte d'Ivoire	865	-6	-69
23	Australia	857	-2	-6
24	Ukraine	848	-2	0
25	Czech Republic	828	0	0
26	Denmark	827	2	7
27	Ghana	823	7	76
27	Israel	823	-1	0
29	Paraguay	806	0	0
30	Bulgaria	801	0	0
31	Algeria	784	-5	-39
32	Norway	772	0	12
33	Slovenia	767	-2	0
34	Honduras	759	3	21
35	Ecuador	753	2	15
36	Slovakia	752	-3	0
37	Republic of Ireland	746	-2	0
38	Romania	745	-2	0
39	Colombia	736	0	0
40	Japan	729	3	20
40	Northern Ireland	729	0	0
42	Turkey	728	-1	0
43	Sweden	727	-1	6
44	Gabon	706	4	46
45	Costa Rica	699	-1	-2
46	Scotland	665	0	0
47	Venezuela	646	3	0
48	Bosnia-Herzegovina	645	3	3
49	Korea Republic	634	3	9
49	Latvia	634	-4	-43

Egypt Win Ghana 1:0 in Angola 2010 vedio

2010-01-31T14:26:00.000-08:00

Egypt entered the record books here on Sunday, beating Ghana 1-0 in the final of the Africa Cup of Nations with supersub Mohamed 'Gedo' Nagy lifting the Pharaohs to their third straight title.

Mohamed Nagy (Gedo) of Egypt celebrates after scoring a goal during their final match of the African Cup of Nations CAN2010 at the November 11 stadium in Luanda, Angola.

Gedo, who has scored from the bench in Egypt's last four games in Angola, came on in the 63rd minute and produced his magic with five minutes left on the clock to cement Egypt's standing as the kings of Africa.

The win also gave veteran coach Hassan Shehata a history-making third championship after Cairo in 2006 and Accra in 2008 and extended Egypt's unbeaten record in the competition to an astonishing 19 games.

Shehata's assistant, Shawky Garib, said: "I'd like to congratulate Ghana for what they did today (Sunday).

"It's important to take your chance, and today we took it. But we respect the Ghana team, they played a very good match today.

"We said we were the champions from the first day we arrived in Angola, and we would defend our title.

"We have won three titles in 2006, 2008 and 2010. This was the most difficult of all of them."

By the end it all felt very familiar. There again was the goalkeeper, Essam El Hadary, bouncing up and down on the crossbar. There again was the coach, Hassan Shehata, being thrown in the air by his players like a birthday boy being given the bumps. And there, yet again, was Ahmed Hassan, receiving the cup from Issa Hayatou, raising it and pointing his finger in the air in thanks to Allah. As it was in Cairo, as it was in Accra, so it was again in Luanda.

By winning an unprecedented third consecutive Cup of Nations, this Egypt side have confirmed their place in history. They will not be at this summer's World Cup finals in South Africa but this may be the best team Africa has produced. Records were broken or extended wherever you looked.

This is Egypt's seventh title, three more than their nearest challengers, Cameroon and Ghana, who must now live in the knowledge that they have only won as many as Hassan, Egypt's remarkable captain. Five other players – This is Egypt's seventh title, three more than their nearest challengers, Cameroon and Ghana, who must now live in the knowledge that they have won only as many as Hassan, Egypt's remarkable captain. Five other players – El Hadary, Hany Said, Wael Gomaa, Ahmed Fathy and Emad Meteeb – played in all three finals, while Shehata who, after 18 games, is still unbeaten in the competition, equalled the Ghanaian CK Gyamfi's record of three titles as coach.

As in those previous two finals Egypt were not especially convincing. They were the best team in the tournament and deserved their success but they were perhaps fortunate that a youthful Ghana could not find penetration to match their passing. Asamoah Gyan, a figure reborn in this competition, toiled heroically alone up front but their coach, Milovan Rajevac, will know he was left too isolated. Only with a couple of free-kicks, one just too high and one flapped uneasily wide by El Hadary, did they go close.

The game, in the end, was decided by the prolific substitute Mohamed Gedo, who took his tally for the tournament to five and confirmed himself as top scorer, as he played a one-two with Mohamed Zidan, advanced into the box and curled a precise finish beyond Richard Kingson. There were Ghanaian tears at the end, but Rajevac's side are too gifted, too matureThere were Ghanaian tears at the end, but Rajevac's side are too gifted, too mature to fade away, and will surely be back. This Egypt, though, perhaps will not. This has been one of the greatest of all generations, but, as their general manager Samir Adly acknowledged, the sense is that the sun may be setting on their golden age.

The goal video

Finally we can say : Egypt have been the best team of the tournament and are deserved winners. Ghana, however, were probably the better team in the final, but never made the most of their possession and paid the price when Gedo came off the bench with 20 minutes to go. Ghana at least have the consolation that they have a World Cup to look forward to and, with this young team plus the likes of Michael Essien, they have reason to be optimistic about their chances of getting out of their group in South Africa. Egypt get to keep the trophy as it's their third successive victory.

Nigeria won the game Vs Algerie in Angola 2010

2010-01-30T17:06:00.000-08:00

Algeria fails to recover from there last humiliating defeat from Egypt 4-0 and drops to 4th place in the African Cup of Nations 2010…

Nigeria won 1:0

The only match Goal

Egypt Win Algerie 4:1 in Angola 2010

2010-01-28T17:37:00.000-08:00

Egypt strolled through to their third successive Africa Cup of Nations final, overcoming Algeria 4-0, with their great rivals finishing with eight men.

Hosni Abd Rabou put Egypt ahead from the spot, after Algeria’s Rafik Halliche was sent-off for the foul.

Mohamed Zidan doubled the lead, before Mohamed Abdelshafi made it three and Mohamed Gedo completed the rout.

Algeria totally lost their discipline and saw Nadir Belhadj and keeper Fawzi Chaouchi also dismissed late on.

Finally Every one is saying that

Egypt have Mummified Algeria in Angola January 28th 2010,

Video of the Goals

Brittany Murphy Death Sunday !

2009-12-21T08:05:00.000-08:00

“Just Married” and “Uptown Girls” Star

Actress Brittany Murphy

but saw her fortunes fade in recent years, died Sunday after going into cardiac arrest, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Murphy was pronounced dead at 10:04 a.m. at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, hospital spokeswoman Sally Stewart said.

Murphy was transported to the hospital after the Los Angeles Fire Department responded to a call at 8 a.m. at the home she shared with her husband, British screenwriter Simon Monjack, in the Hollywood Hills.

She was just 32.!! :(

The death was first reported by online gossip site TMZ, which added Murphy was found unconscious in the shower in her LA home by her mother. TMZ says the LA coroner will begin an investigation into Murphy's death today.

Murphy has been married to screen writer Simon Monjack since 2007 and has no children.

Although I'm not a GREAT fan of her But it still a Shocking news To die in such a young age like that !!!

Obama's Nobel Peace Prize speech Full Text!

2009-12-10T09:18:00.001-08:00

Obama's Nobel Peace Prize speech .... Here's the full text for the speech

- Weather you agree he deserves it or no ........ The man get it !!

We hope he work more and more for peace :)

He started his speech in Oslo SAYING :

"Your Majesties, Your Royal Highnesses, Distinguished Members of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, citizens of America, and citizens of the world:

I receive this honor with deep gratitude and great humility. It is an award that speaks to our highest aspirations - that for all the cruelty and hardship of our world, we are not mere prisoners of fate. Our actions matter, and can bend history in the direction of justice.

And yet I would be remiss if I did not acknowledge the considerable controversy that your generous decision has generated. In part, this is because I am at the beginning, and not the end, of my labors on the world stage. Compared to some of the giants of history who have received this prize - Schweitzer and King; Marshall and Mandela - my accomplishments are slight. And then there are the men and women around the world who have been jailed and beaten in the pursuit of justice; those who toil in humanitarian organizations to relieve suffering; the unrecognized millions whose quiet acts of courage and compassion inspire even the most hardened of cynics. I cannot argue with those who find these men and women - some known, some obscure to all but those they help - to be far more deserving of this honor than I. >>>>>>>>>>>> ((( I agree )))) ;)

He continued saying ,,,,,,,,,,,,

But perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that I am the Commander-in-Chief of a nation in the midst of two wars. One of these wars is winding down. The other is a conflict that America did not seek; one in which we are joined by forty three other countries - including Norway - in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks.

Still, we are at war, and I am responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land. Some will kill. Some will be killed. And so I come here with an acute sense of the cost of armed conflict - filled with difficult questions about the relationship between war and peace, and our effort to replace one with the other.

These questions are not new. War, in one form or another, appeared with the first man. At the dawn of history, its morality was not questioned; it was simply a fact, like drought or disease - the manner in which tribes and then civilizations sought power and settled their differences.

Over time, as codes of law sought to control violence within groups, so did philosophers, clerics, and statesmen seek to regulate the destructive power of war. The concept of a "just war" emerged, suggesting that war is justified only when it meets certain preconditions: if it is waged as a last resort or in self-defense; if the forced used is proportional, and if, whenever possible, civilians are spared from violence.

For most of history, this concept of just war was rarely observed. The capacity of human beings to think up new ways to kill one another proved inexhaustible, as did our capacity to exempt from mercy those who look different or pray to a different God. Wars between armies gave way to wars between nations - total wars in which the distinction between combatant and civilian became blurred. In the span of thirty years, such carnage would twice engulf this continent. And while it is hard to conceive of a cause more just than the defeat of the Third Reich and the Axis powers, World War II was a conflict in which the total number of civilians who died exceeded the number of soldiers who perished.

In the wake of such destruction, and with the advent of the nuclear age, it became clear to victor and vanquished alike that the world needed institutions to prevent another World War. And so, a quarter century after the United States Senate rejected the League of Nations - an idea for which Woodrow Wilson received this Prize - America led the world in constructing an architecture to keep the peace: a Marshall Plan and a United Nations, mechanisms to govern the waging of war, treaties to protect human rights, prevent genocide, and restrict the most dangerous weapons.

In many ways, these efforts succeeded. Yes, terrible wars have been fought, and atrocities committed. But there has been no Third World War. The Cold War ended with jubilant crowds dismantling a wall. Commerce has stitched much of the world together. Billions have been lifted from poverty. The ideals of liberty, self-determination, equality and the rule of law have haltingly advanced. We are the heirs of the fortitude and foresight of generations past, and it is a legacy for which my own country is rightfully proud.

A decade into a new century, this old architecture is buckling under the weight of new threats. The world may no longer shudder at the prospect of war between two nuclear superpowers, but proliferation may increase the risk of catastrophe. Terrorism has long been a tactic, but modern technology allows a few small men with outsized rage to murder innocents on a horrific scale.

If Reading bores you ....... Just like me :) You will find The video for the Full speech at the end of the article

Down

,,,,,,

continue ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Moreover, wars between nations have increasingly given way to wars within nations. The resurgence of ethnic or sectarian conflicts; the growth of secessionist movements, insurgencies, and failed states; have increasingly trapped civilians in unending chaos. In today's wars, many more civilians are killed than soldiers; the seeds of future conflict are sewn, economies are wrecked, civil societies torn asunder, refugees amassed, and children scarred.

I do not bring with me today a definitive solution to the problems of war. What I do know is that meeting these challenges will require the same vision, hard work, and persistence of those men and women who acted so boldly decades ago. And it will require us to think in new ways about the notions of just war and the imperatives of a just peace.

We must begin by acknowledging the hard truth that we will not eradicate violent conflict in our lifetimes. There will be times when nations - acting individually or in concert - will find the use of force not only necessary but morally justified.

I make this statement mindful of what Martin Luther King said in this same ceremony years ago - "Violence never brings permanent peace. It solves no social problem: it merely creates new and more complicated ones." As someone who stands here as a direct consequence of Dr. King's life's work, I am living testimony to the moral force of non-violence. I know there is nothing weak -nothing passive - nothing naïve - in the creed and lives of Gandhi and King.

But as a head of state sworn to protect and defend my nation, I cannot be guided by their examples alone. I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people. For make no mistake: evil does exist in the world. A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot convince al Qaeda's leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism - it is a recognition of history; the imperfections of man and the limits of reason.

I raise this point because in many countries there is a deep ambivalence about military action today, no matter the cause. At times, this is joined by a reflexive suspicion of America, the world's sole military superpower.

Yet the world must remember that it was not simply international institutions - not just treaties and declarations - that brought stability to a post-World War II world. Whatever mistakes we have made, the plain fact is this: the United States of America has helped underwrite global security for more than six decades with the blood of our citizens and the strength of our arms. The service and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform has promoted peace and prosperity from Germany to Korea, and enabled democracy to take hold in places like the Balkans. We have borne this burden not because we seek to impose our will. We have done so out of enlightened self-interest - because we seek a better future for our children and grandchildren, and we believe that their lives will be better if other peoples' children and grandchildren can live in freedom and prosperity.

So yes, the instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace. And yet this truth must coexist with another - that no matter how justified, war promises human tragedy. The soldier's courage and sacrifice is full of glory, expressing devotion to country, to cause and to comrades in arms. But war itself is never glorious, and we must never trumpet it as such.

So part of our challenge is reconciling these two seemingly irreconcilable truths - that war is sometimes necessary, and war is at some level an expression of human feelings. Concretely, we must direct our effort to the task that President Kennedy called for long ago. "Let us focus," he said, "on a more practical, more attainable peace, based not on a sudden revolution in human nature but on a gradual evolution in human institutions."

What might this evolution look like? What might these practical steps be?

To begin with, I believe that all nations - strong and weak alike - must adhere to standards that govern the use of force. I - like any head of state - reserve the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend my nation. Nevertheless, I am convinced that adhering to standards strengthens those who do, and isolates - and weakens - those who don't.

The world rallied around America after the 9/11 attacks, and continues to support our efforts in Afghanistan, because of the horror of those senseless attacks and the recognized principle of self-defense. Likewise, the world recognized the need to confront Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait - a consensus that sent a clear message to all about the cost of aggression.

Furthermore, America cannot insist that others follow the rules of the road if we refuse to follow them ourselves. For when we don't, our action can appear arbitrary, and undercut the legitimacy of future intervention - no matter how justified.

This becomes particularly important when the purpose of military action extends beyond self defense or the defense of one nation against an aggressor. More and more, we all confront difficult questions about how to prevent the slaughter of civilians by their own government, or to stop a civil war whose violence and suffering can engulf an entire region.

I believe that force can be justified on humanitarian grounds, as it was in the Balkans, or in other places that have been scarred by war. Inaction tears at our conscience and can lead to more costly intervention later. That is why all responsible nations must embrace the role that militaries with a clear mandate can play to keep the peace.

America's commitment to global security will never waiver. But in a world in which threats are more diffuse, and missions more complex, America cannot act alone. This is true in Afghanistan. This is true in failed states like Somalia, where terrorism and piracy is joined by famine and human suffering. And sadly, it will continue to be true in unstable regions for years to come.

The leaders and soldiers of NATO countries - and other friends and allies - demonstrate this truth through the capacity and courage they have shown in Afghanistan. But in many countries, there is a disconnect between the efforts of those who serve and the ambivalence of the broader public. I understand why war is not popular. But I also know this: the belief that peace is desirable is rarely enough to achieve it. Peace requires responsibility. Peace entails sacrifice. That is why NATO continues to be indispensable. That is why we must strengthen UN and regional peacekeeping, and not leave the task to a few countries. That is why we honor those who return home from peacekeeping and training abroad to Oslo and Rome; to Ottawa and Sydney; to Dhaka and Kigali - we honor them not as makers of war, but as wagers of peace.

Let me make one final point about the use of force. Even as we make difficult decisions about going to war, we must also think clearly about how we fight it. The Nobel Committee recognized this truth in awarding its first prize for peace to Henry Dunant - the founder of the Red Cross, and a driving force behind the Geneva Conventions.

Where force is necessary, we have a moral and strategic interest in binding ourselves to certain rules of conduct. And even as we confront a vicious adversary that abides by no rules, I believe that the United States of America must remain a standard bearer in the conduct of war. That is what makes us different from those whom we fight. That is a source of our strength. That is why I prohibited torture. That is why I ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed. And that is why I have reaffirmed America's commitment to abide by the Geneva Conventions. We lose ourselves when we compromise the very ideals that we fight to defend. And we honor those ideals by upholding them not just when it is easy, but when it is hard.

I have spoken to the questions that must weigh on our minds and our hearts as we choose to wage war. But let me turn now to our effort to avoid such tragic choices, and speak of three ways that we can build a just and lasting peace.

First, in dealing with those nations that break rules and laws, I believe that we must develop alternatives to violence that are tough enough to change behavior - for if we want a lasting peace, then the words of the international community must mean something. Those regimes that break the rules must be held accountable. Sanctions must exact a real price. Intransigence must be met with increased pressure - and such pressure exists only when the world stands together as one.

One urgent example is the effort to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, and to seek a world without them. In the middle of the last century, nations agreed to be bound by a treaty whose bargain is clear: all will have access to peaceful nuclear power; those without nuclear weapons will forsake them; and those with nuclear weapons will work toward disarmament. I am committed to upholding this treaty. It is a centerpiece of my foreign policy. And I am working with President Medvedev to reduce America and Russia's nuclear stockpiles.

But it is also incumbent upon all of us to insist that nations like Iran and North Korea do not game the system. Those who claim to respect international law cannot avert their eyes when those laws are flouted. Those who care for their own security cannot ignore the danger of an arms race in the Middle East or East Asia. Those who seek peace cannot stand idly by as nations arm themselves for nuclear war.

The same principle applies to those who violate international law by brutalizing their own people. When there is genocide in Darfur; systematic rape in Congo; or repression in Burma - there must be consequences. And the closer we stand together, the less likely we will be faced with the choice between armed intervention and complicity in oppression.

This brings me to a second point - the nature of the peace that we seek. For peace is not merely the absence of visible conflict. Only a just peace based upon the inherent rights and dignity of every individual can truly be lasting.

It was this insight that drove drafters of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights after the Second World War. In the wake of devastation, they recognized that if human rights are not protected, peace is a hollow promise.

And yet all too often, these words are ignored. In some countries, the failure to uphold human rights is excused by the false suggestion that these are Western principles, foreign to local cultures or stages of a nation's development. And within America, there has long been a tension between those who describe themselves as realists or idealists - a tension that suggests a stark choice between the narrow pursuit of interests or an endless campaign to impose our values.

I reject this choice. I believe that peace is unstable where citizens are denied the right to speak freely or worship as they please; choose their own leaders or assemble without fear. Pent up grievances fester, and the suppression of tribal and religious identity can lead to violence. We also know that the opposite is true. Only when Europe became free did it finally find peace. America has never fought a war against a democracy, and our closest friends are governments that protect the rights of their citizens. No matter how callously defined, neither America's interests - nor the world's -are served by the denial of human aspirations.

So even as we respect the unique culture and traditions of different countries, America will always be a voice for those aspirations that are universal. We will bear witness to the quiet dignity of reformers like Aung Sang Suu Kyi; to the bravery of Zimbabweans who cast their ballots in the face of beatings; to the hundreds of thousands who have marched silently through the streets of Iran. It is telling that the leaders of these governments fear the aspirations of their own people more than the power of any other nation. And it is the responsibility of all free people and free nations to make clear to these movements that hope and history are on their side

Let me also say this: the promotion of human rights cannot be about exhortation alone. At times, it must be coupled with painstaking diplomacy. I know that engagement with repressive regimes lacks the satisfying purity of indignation. But I also know that sanctions without outreach - and condemnation without discussion - can carry forward a crippling status quo. No repressive regime can move down a new path unless it has the choice of an open door.

In light of the Cultural Revolution's horrors, Nixon's meeting with Mao appeared inexcusable - and yet it surely helped set China on a path where millions of its citizens have been lifted from poverty, and connected to open societies. Pope John Paul's engagement with Poland created space not just for the Catholic Church, but for labor leaders like Lech Walesa. Ronald Reagan's efforts on arms control and embrace of perestroika not only improved relations with the Soviet Union, but empowered dissidents throughout Eastern Europe. There is no simple formula here. But we must try as best we can to balance isolation and engagement; pressure and incentives, so that human rights and dignity are advanced over time.

Third, a just peace includes not only civil and political rights - it must encompass economic security and opportunity. For true peace is not just freedom from fear, but freedom from want.

It is undoubtedly true that development rarely takes root without security; it is also true that security does not exist where human beings do not have access to enough food, or clean water, or the medicine they need to survive. It does not exist where children cannot aspire to a decent education or a job that supports a family. The absence of hope can rot a society from within.

And that is why helping farmers feed their own people - or nations educate their children and care for the sick - is not mere charity. It is also why the world must come together to confront climate change. There is little scientific dispute that if we do nothing, we will face more drought, famine and mass displacement that will fuel more conflict for decades. For this reason, it is not merely scientists and activists who call for swift and forceful action - it is military leaders in my country and others who understand that our common security hangs in the balance.

Agreements among nations. Strong institutions. Support for human rights. Investments in development. All of these are vital ingredients in bringing about the evolution that President Kennedy spoke about. And yet, I do not believe that we will have the will, or the staying power, to complete this work without something more - and that is the continued expansion of our moral imagination; an insistence that there is something irreducible that we all share.

As the world grows smaller, you might think it would be easier for human beings to recognize how similar we are; to understand that we all basically want the same things; that we all hope for the chance to live out our lives with some measure of happiness and fulfillment for ourselves and our families.

And yet, given the dizzying pace of globalization, and the cultural leveling of modernity, it should come as no surprise that people fear the loss of what they cherish about their particular identities - their race, their tribe, and perhaps most powerfully their religion. In some places, this fear has led to conflict. At times, it even feels like we are moving backwards. We see it in Middle East, as the conflict between Arabs and Jews seems to harden. We see it in nations that are torn asunder by tribal lines Most dangerously, we see it in the way that religion is used to justify the murder of innocents by those who have distorted and defiled the great religion of Islam, and who attacked my country from Afghanistan. These extremists are not the first to kill in the name of God; the cruelties of the Crusades are amply recorded. But they remind us that no Holy War can ever be a just war. For if you truly believe that you are carrying out divine will, then there is no need for restraint - no need to spare the pregnant mother, or the medic, or even a person of one's own faith. Such a warped view of religion is not just incompatible with the concept of peace, but the purpose of faith - for the one rule that lies at the heart of every major religion is that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.

Adhering to this law of love has always been the core struggle of human nature. We are fallible. We make mistakes, and fall victim to the temptations of pride, and power, and sometimes evil. Even those of us with the best intentions will at times fail to right the wrongs before us.

But we do not have to think that human nature is perfect for us to still believe that the human condition can be perfected. We do not have to live in an idealized world to still reach for those ideals that will make it a better place. The non-violence practiced by men like Gandhi and King may not have been practical or possible in every circumstance, but the love that they preached - their faith in human progress - must always be the North Star that guides us on our journey.

So let us reach for the world that ought to be - that spark of the divine that still stirs within each of our souls. Somewhere today, in the here and now, a soldier sees he's outgunned but stands firm to keep the peace. Somewhere today, in this world, a young protestor awaits the brutality of her government, but has the courage to march on. Somewhere today, a mother facing punishing poverty still takes the time to teach her child, who believes that a cruel world still has a place for his dreams.

Let us live by their example. We can acknowledge that oppression will always be with us, and still strive for justice. We can admit the intractability of depravation, and still strive for dignity. We can understand that there will be war, and still strive for peace. We can do that - for that is the story of human progress; that is the hope of all the world; and at this moment of challenge, that must be our work here on Earth.

He of course Finished his speech with his famous self-confidence smile Accompanied by clubbing and cheers from the audience

Here,s the video for the speech

Enjoy it ;) !!

How to use Google Goggles ??

2009-12-08T10:17:00.000-08:00

How to use Google Goggles ??!!!!!

IN case you don't know what is google goggles

you can visit

http://tellmewhathappens.blogspot.com/2009/12/google-goggles-amazing-service.html

First your cell phone should be able to run Android 1.6+ (i.e. Donut or Eclair)

Google said on its website

that a picture is worth a thousand words.No need to type your search anymore. Just take a picture.!!!

Find out what businesses are nearby.Just point your phone at a store.

This is just the beginning - it's not quite perfect yet.Works well for some things, but not for all.

Your pictures, your control.Turn on 'visual search history' to view or share your pictures at any time. Turn it off to discard them once the search is done.

This video help you to know

"How to use Google Goggles ,or,Googles ;)
_in case you miss-spelled it !_

Google Goggles amazing service !!!

2009-12-07T15:36:00.000-08:00

Google Goggles Visual Search!!

What is this supposed to mean ?!!!

Mobile searching has just gotten way, way cooler.

GOOGLE Never stop Surprising us

Google unveiled its new Google Goggles visual search tool for Android on Monday, bringing a high-tech twist to accessing information on the go.

Let's explore !!!

Google Goggles: An Introduction

Google Goggles -- not to be confused with Google Mail Goggles, the company's inebriated e-mailing preventer -- lets you search from your cell phone simply by snapping a photo. Want more info on a product? Take its picture. Need info about a business? Photograph the storefront. Put simply, this thing packs some serious power, and its capabilities stretch far.

Google Goggles currently supports photo-based searching for (take a deep breath): books, DVDs, landmarks, logos, contact info, artwork, businesses, products, barcodes, and plain text.

Here's how it works: When you capture an image, Google breaks it down into object-based signatures.!!!!

It then compares those signatures against every item it can find in its image database. Within seconds, it returns the results to you, ordered by rank. Some results are returned before you even snap a photo, too, thanks to seamless integration of GPS and compass functionality.!!!

But enough on the nuts and bolts. Let's put search-by-sight to the test.

Hands-On With Google Goggles

I started out with something easy: a book. After opening the app, I followed the instructions and took a photo. Google Goggles started analyzing the image. Sure enough, seconds later, I had the results.!!! Soo easy !!

Just from seeing the book's cover, Google Goggles gave me the full name and links to compare prices or even preview the text!!!!! Woooow !!!!!

. Below that, it returned regular search results for the title. Not too shabby.

The app worked equally well with a DVD: I photographed the cover of Swingers and received information about the movie, followed by pages of relevant Web results. (I

How about something a bit more involved? I grabbed a nearby bag of chips to see if Google Goggles could grab the logo. Once again, no problems: The app saw that the chips were made by Lays and gave me a screen of info about the company. Amazing !!!!!

I didn't mean it to be an advertisment ;)

Even an obscure product like a tub of protein powder seems to work without so much as a hiccup. Google Goggles matched the actual photo to an online image from a retailer's Web site, then gave me ample info about the stuff. more amazing news !!

Next up: art. Luckily, I had a book of Magritte paintings in my office. I flipped open to a random page and took a photo. Google Goggles got it.!!

Good work !! (Thumb up )

The Google gang says the app can detect and detail wine, so I figured it was worth a shot. This one took a couple of tries -- the first bottle I attempted didn't work -- but Goggles was able to pull up details about the second label I shot.

That's not Every thing !!!!

Goggles uses data from the phone's GPS and compass to deliver live augmented-reality results as well. You just point your phone at any location -- a business, for example -- and the app places a button with the business name at the bottom of your screen. Tap the button, and Goggles loads info about the business from a Web search. No snapshot is needed.!!!!

Well Thanks GOOGLE

never stop surprising us :) !!

I love you Google

Why Google choosed Popeye?!!!

2009-12-07T15:04:00.000-08:00

Google new doodle “Popeye”

Of course you tried to use Google today !

And you noticed POPEYE'S DOODLE

And you wondered ,,,,why ?!!!

Actually .....

Google is celebrating Elzie Crisler Segar’s birthday

it was on (December 8, 1894 – but he died October 13, 1938),

E.C Segar was an American cartoonist and best known for creating “Popeye“. the famous cartoon

To celebrate E.C Segar’s birthday Google has added a new doodle of Popeye, clicking the doodle will take you to search results on E.C Segar !!!!

This doodle was only visible in Australia, New Zealand and a few other countries at the moment “8:30 am Australian time”.

But now It's visible to every person on this planet :)

Don't miss the spinach ;)

Tiger Woods Scandal !!! where is the truth ?

2009-12-03T10:40:00.000-08:00

The Tiger Woods scandal !!!!!

I think this scandal has been powered by silence and mistresses .!!

Until yesterday. At last, the Tiger Woods scandal got a decisive comment from Woods himself !!!!
, which served as the confession most wanted to hear.

Of course, he didn't get too specific about his "transgressions" and continued to demand for privacy.((It's my OWN life ,...,...,iI need some privacy ,...Don't disturb me ,....bla bla bla))))

But the Tiger Woods scandal is now a little closer toward the end, as soon as his mistresses stop talking.

What really made the scandal go on so long was the golf legend's denial. As more and more conflicting details came out about the car accident, and about Woods' alleged affairs, the calls for a response were deafening. Though he maintained privacy, the details and evidence finally became tooooooooooo much.

While the media debated on whether he still had a right to privacy or no !

, SHE came forward to give them actual evidence.

After that, the scandal became too loud to ignore, so Woods gave the press their statement, and his quasi-confession.

Though he wouldn't go into any detail about the affairs, and the women, it may be all that the press will get from him. As such, now that he admitted to some of this, the Tiger Woods scandal has a much shorter shelf-life. :D

Now that the debate over whether he should talk is over, most of the legitimate media seem ready to give him that privacy. His famous friends still stand by him, as do his corporate sponsors, so there isn't too much need for him to speak anymore.

Though the scandal isn't quite over, Tiger Woods now has more breathing room. He doesn't have to play golf again until January 2010, and by then, the alleged mistresses should have exhausted their 15 minutes. Whether his family will still be intact by then is unclear, but he can focus on that task more clearly.

Woods himself no longer has any reason to talk, but that won't stop the mistresses and TMZ.

I think the Woods gang should then rest until he returns to the links.

"Going Rogue",,, New Sarah Palin's book

2009-11-17T09:18:00.000-08:00

Of course you heared about Sarah Palin new book (( Going Rogue ))!!!`

But If you didn't hear about it I can tell you What is inside AND behind ;) the book ;)

All secrets are now revealed !!!!!

Sarah Palin may claim to scorn elites, but her new book will ring familiar to its Beltway readers.

Getting even with those who crossed her, praising her allies and generally putting a self-serving sheen on last year’s presidential campaign, “Going Rogue” is typical of the political memoir genre of recent vintage. It’s the sort of book that will send the political class scurrying to bookstores, eager to see how they fared in what’s known as “the Washington read.”

With no index, though, Palin’s book has made that ritual more difficult.

It's in stores ON Tuesday .......

oNE OF THE NEWS papers has created a reader’s guide to “Going Rogue,” grouping the many characters into three categories, based upon that familiar question insiders are already whispering to those who managed to snag a copy of the book: How did I come out?

Sarah uses to describe the 2008 presidential campaign pits most of her advisers, the endearingly-named “B Team,” against the dreaded staffers running John McCain’s campaign back in suburban Washington, often simply derided as “headquarters.”

She has especially kind words for the campaign officials she bonded with during the campaign and, in some cases, remains in contact with them .

This “B Team” includes such aides as Jason Recher, Chris Edwards, Tracey Schmitt, Jeannie Etchart, Bexie Nobles, Matthew Scully, Randy Scheunemann, Steve Biegun.

All receive generous treatment.

Biegun is even spared by a key omission in the book. Even though it has been reported that he was responsible for the embarrassing prank call Palin took from a pair of French Canadian DJs posing as the President of France, Palin only identifies the aide as “a campaign adviser.”

“I felt bad for him because he was an absolutely stellar professional, so I knew these radio guys had to be really good to get around him,” SARAH writes.

John and Cindy McCain receive fulsome praise throughout the book from Palin, him as a brave American hero and her as a mix of elegant lady and Every Mom.

But the Arizona senator is also portrayed as the final enforcer of the decision not to let Palin speak on Election Night, something that plainly pained her.

She recounts telling McCain in the campaign’s hotel suite in Phoenix on Election Night that she wanted to use her remarks to thank him:

“’No these guys have it covered,’ he said, nodding in [campaign chief Steve] Schmidt’s direction. ‘They’ve got it handled.’”

Palin then writes: “I knew that was that. I thanked John again for everything and walked out of the room.”

McCain’s close friend Joe Lieberman, the Connecticut senator, also won accolades from Palin for soothing her during a stressful debate prep session.

“God is going to see you through this,” Palin recalls Lieberman telling her, noting that she found it “so heartfelt, so genuine, so sincere.”

FOES:

Much of the portion of the book devoted to Palin’s time as vice presidential nominee and her last year in Alaska is filled with her grievances against a handful of MacCain campaign aides and Media.

In particular, Palin trains her fire at Steve Schmidt, campaign advisers Mark and Nicolle Wallace and CBS news anchor Katie Couric.

Schmidt, especially, receives the brunt of Palin’s blasts.

She describes him as variously quick-tempered, profane, overweight, threatening and incompetent. Plus, she notes, he was a smoker. (Though she does allow at one point that he can inspire loyalty and manage the press).

Complaining about being muzzled, she writes: “I questioned Schmidt about what headquarters would and would not allow me to say. Schmidt was a busy guy; he didn’t have a lot of time to elaborate, no doubt. He replied coolly, ‘Just stick to the script.’”

Taking issue with what she said was Schmidt’s attempt to get her a nutritionist, Palin observes: “As he lectured, I looked at his rotund physique and noted that he used nicotine to keep his own cognitive connections humming along.”

Schmidt also comes in for rough treatment in an anecdote Palin says took place between the campaign aide and Scheunemann after reports in POLITICO and CNN detailed the tensions between the veep candidate and McCain’s staff.

Citing Scheunemann, who remains a Palin adviser, she writes: “Schmidt issued a threat that was veiled enough for deniability but clear as day if you were on the receiving end: if there were are any more leaks critical of anybody in the handling of Sarah Palin, then a lot more negative stuff would be said about Sarah Palin.”

When Palin got prank-called by the two disc jockeys impersonating the president of France, she again paints Schmidt in a negative light.

“One of the first calls was Schmidt, and the force of his screaming blew my hair back. ‘How can anyone be so stupid?! Why would the president of France call a vice presidential candidate a few days out?

“Good question, I thought. Weren’t you the ones who set this up?

“As Schmidt’s rant blazed on, I pictured cell towers between D.C. and Florida bursting into flame. I held the phone slightly away from my head.”

Schmidt is also singled out on election night as the heavy who told Palin she wouldn’t be able to deliver a speech along with McCain’s own concession.

“Absolutely not,” Schmidt said. “I don’t even know why you wrote a speech. Nobody told you to.

“That set me back on my heels. I was surprised that he was surprised.”

Of Nicolle Wallace, a former top Bush administration official, Palin writes, “I had to trust her experience, as she had dealt with national politics more than I had. But something always struck me as peculiar about the way she recalled her days in the White House, when she was speaking on behalf of President George W. Bush. She didn’t have much to say that was positive about her former boss or the job in general.”

Palin also casts Nicolle Wallace as something of an insensitive snob, recalling that the campaign adviser informed her that her clothing was inappropriate for a vice-presidential nominee.

“She flipped through my wardrobe with raised eyebrows,” Palin writes of Wallace from a scene in the candidate’s bedroom after she returned to Alaska for her interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson.
“No…no…no,” [Wallace] said as she slid each garment aside on its hangar.”

And so as to make unmistakable her disdain for Mark Wallace, Nicolle’s husband, the former Alaska governor includes a picture of the aide holding up his arms at her during a hotel room debate preparation session during a photograph montage otherwise devoted to upbeat images of Palin, her family and supporters.

“This picture says it all,” Palin writes in the caption. “A dark hotel room in Philadelphia and a frustrated Mark Wallace trying to tell me which of his non-answers I should give during debate prep.”

Palin never flatly accuses any of the top McCain advisers as being responsible for the leaks against her, but she comes close in recounting a scene from the hotel pool in Phoenix on the day after the election when the Wallaces stopped to say their good-byes.

“’I think you should know that for the next few days it’s going to get really nasty,’” Palin recalls Nicolle Wallace saying. “’Negative stories in the press. You should just be ready, that’s always how it goes. Hang on your hats!’

“That made no sense to Todd—why would anything ‘get nasty?’ And how could anyone know what would be coming in the media?

“But the Wallaces waved good-bye, and that was that.”

Often, names weren’t necessary to make the point—criticizing the generic “headquarters” sufficed, as in this lament from the last weeks of the campaign: “We asked whether we could expand the message, but by then it seemed, at least according to reports like the New York Times Magazine piece by Robert Draper, that headquarters might have already given up.”

Or from campaign’s end: “Since headquarters had micromanaged everything I did and said for weeks…”

Her home state of Alaska, its denizens and trusted aides like Meg Stapleton get much softer and kinder treatment, but Palin does take after some liberal opponents from back home—and a former colleague as well.

Though not mentioned by name, John Bitney is easily identifiable as the former aide whom Palin writes “turned out to be a BlackBerry games addict who couldn't seem to keep his lunch off his tie."

The policy director on Palin’s gubernatorial campaign, Bitney was her first legislative director in Juneau but is now a critic who is frequently interviewed by reporters.

Yet is CBS news anchor Katie Couric who is singled out for special treatment, emerging among media figures as Palin Enemy Number One.

“As for Katie Couric — where do I begin?” Palin writes, recounting what she concedes was an awful interview with the network anchor.

Though she accepts some culpability for the disastrous interview, Palin accuses Couric of having gone easier on Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden, and twice claims that the newswoman’s own clothing stylist was actually part of the team hired by the GOP to outfit the vice-presidential candidate for the campaign. Palin even takes a swipe at Couric’s patriotism.

Palin writes of a National Press Club event where Couric addressed journalists about the news media’s behavior immediately following the Sept. 11 attacks.

According to Palin’s account, Couric told her media colleagues: “The whole culture of wearing flags on our lapel and saying ‘we’ when referring to the United States and, even the ‘shock and awe’ of the initial stages, it was just too jubilant and a little uncomfortable.”

Writes Palin of this assessment: “Unbelievable !!!!!!!! .”

Among journalists, Couric may have come in for the most personal criticism but Palin also devotes considerable space to bemoaning the press corps in general. When, for example, she details her return to Alaska after the campaign, Palin grumbles about unnamed “pundits and reporters” who criticized her for “not attending the celebrity-packed events we were invited to Outside.”

Disputing some of the analysts who said then-Sen. Barack Obama outperformed McCain at the first presidential debate, Palin writes: “Granted, 90 percent of the newspeople covering the debate were liberal.”

At other times, Palin flatly accuses reporters as stalking and harassing her family.

IN BETWEEN:

Palin seems to spare those individuals who, unlike Schmidt, haven’t criticized her since the campaign or who she doesn’t seem to suspect as leakers who disparaged her, like the Wallaces.

So even though senior campaign aides Mark Salter and Rick Davis played a pivotal role in the campaign—and at “headquarters”—they are largely absent from the book.

Of Salter, she does allow that her first impression was that he seemed “friendlier and quieter than Schmidt” and was a loyal and influential adviser to the senator.

As she does with Biegun and the prank call incident, Palin appears to offer Salter anonymity in recounting the scene on election night when she was told she would not be speaking.

Even though Salter has been identified in other reports as one of the heavies who delivered the news, Palin writes only that a “senior staffer” said: “’You know you won’t be giving a speech.’”

Even though he was a Schmidt friend, her traveling chief of staff, Andrew Smith, isn’t bloodied too badly either.

"It seemed odd that we were being put in the hands of a man who had never run a campaign before, but Andrew seemed like a nice guy, and it wasn't my call,” she said of Smith, a Wall Street veteran.

Another of Palin’s top traveling aides, Tucker Eskew, doesn’t receive the praise that her other “B Team” allies do yet he isn’t scorned like other senior officials.

While calling him a “Southern gentleman,” Palin writes that Eskew stuck to her “like gum on a shoe.”

After events, she recalls, “he’d be waiting for me on the campaign bus steps with an indulgent smile that said, ‘Come over here and let me tell you what you did wrong, bless your heart.’”

You INDEED blessed your heart,,, Sarah !!!

Tell me What Happens ??!!!

ATOMIC Clock !!

311 DAYS

311 Still Does 311 Day?!

Bears win Julius Peppers sweepstakes

Your opinion worth Money !!!

Happy day to every one

Today I’m gonna tell you about the easiest and cheapest way to earn money from your spare time on internet instead of Facebooking or trying your luck on ICQ Chat .

I discovered _For the first time_ that My opinion worth money !!

I never thought that I can make 5 Dollars in 5 minutes ! just for giving my opinion or my feedback .!!

Are you ready to calculate how much I earned after using internet for 2 hours in this job !?!

Although this type of job is very Profitable but it is not well known !

YOU TALKED SO MUCH But YOU DIDN’T TELL US

(((What is this all about ??)))

well ,,,,,

To understand simply the idea of this type of jobslet me give you an example :

After all, who wouldn’t want a couple hundred dollars a day just for giving their opinion?

this is a list of the most trusted websites hiring people for surveys

starting with the cheapest to start Trying and then deciding .

_You don’t have to be an american or living in america to sign upyou will recieve your check wherever you live

And My answer is NO !

you are considered an independent contractor, and no taxes will be withheld from your pay

.!! Cool !

NOW Her's the list for the surveys

sites. I organized them starting with the

cheapest fees of registration .

(1)

This is the first Cheapest most trusted website .you will not lose anything if you tried it for the first time

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

I think this short list of surveys paid websites is enough now Soon I will get you a software that runs more than 3000 Surveys Sites !! Ready to receive any of your questions Send it to

Gama Goat For Sale

Miss me yet Billboard For G.W.Bush real or just An internet trick ??

Who is Jackie Collins And what about her new novel(book) Release ?!!

Do you Support Building the Steel wall between Egypt and Gaza ??!!

Daniel Streich Who banned minarets in Switzerland converted to Islam !!!

What is the cause of Connecticut Middletown explosion??

NBC Black history Menue Fried chicken.cafeteria!!

Todd Leary the Famouse indian broadcaster Was arrested

11 years old girl gave birth to ababy boy !!!

Photos : Sharks attacked a man (kiteboarder )on stuart beach,Florida And killed him

Egypt one of the Top 10 Teams in World

Egypt Win Ghana 1:0 in Angola 2010 vedio

Nigeria won the game Vs Algerie in Angola 2010

Egypt Win Algerie 4:1 in Angola 2010

Brittany Murphy Death Sunday !

Actress Brittany Murphy

Obama's Nobel Peace Prize speech Full Text!

How to use Google Goggles ??

Google Goggles amazing service !!!

Google Goggles Visual Search!!

Why Google choosed Popeye?!!!

Google new doodle “Popeye”

Tiger Woods Scandal !!! where is the truth ?

"Going Rogue",,, New Sarah Palin's book

To understand simply the idea of this type of jobs
let me give you an example :

_You don’t have to be an american or living in america to sign up
you will recieve your check wherever you live

This is the first Cheapest most trusted website .
you will not lose anything if you tried it for the first time

I think this short list of surveys paid websites is enough now

Soon I will get you a software that runs more than 3000 Surveys Sites !!

Ready to receive any of your questions
Send it to